Suche   SiteMap
Home
A bis Z
BIB-KAT
Andere Bibliothekskataloge
Digitale Medien
Dokumentlieferung
Fachspezifische Informationen
Suchhilfen und Datenbanken
 
Eingang zum Volltext in OPUS

Hinweis zum Urheberrecht

Aufsatz zugänglich unter
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:385-11147
URL: http://ubt.opus.hbz-nrw.de/volltexte/2017/1114/


Long-Term Memory Updating: The Reset-of-Encoding Hypothesis in List-Method Directed Forgetting

Pastötter, Bernhard ; Tempel, Tobias ; Bäuml, Karl-Heinz T.

Originalveröffentlichung: (2017) Frontiers in Psychology
pdf-Format:
Dokument 1.pdf (594 KB)

Bookmark bei Connotea Bookmark bei del.icio.us
SWD-Schlagwörter: Langzeitgedächtnis , Verbesserung , Vergessen , Beeinflussung , Information
Freie Schlagwörter (Englisch): long-term memory , episodic memory , directed forgetting , encoding, interference
Institut: Psychologie
DDC-Sachgruppe: Psychologie
Sonstige beteiligte Institution: The publication was funded by the Open Access Fund of Universität Trier and the German Research Foundation (DFG)
Dokumentart: Aufsatz
Sprache: Englisch
Erstellungsjahr: 2017
Publikationsdatum: 20.12.2017
Bemerkung: DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02076
Kurzfassung auf Englisch: People’s memory for new information can be enhanced by cuing them to forget older information, as is shown in list-method directed forgetting (LMDF). In this task, people are cued to forget a previously studied list of items (list 1) and to learn a new list of items (list 2) instead. Such cuing typically enhances memory for the list 2 items and reduces memory for the list 1 items, which reflects effective long-term memory updating. This review focuses on the reset-of-encoding (ROE) hypothesis as a theoretical explanation of the list 2 enhancement effect in LMDF. The ROE hypothesis is based on the finding that encoding efficacy typically decreases with number of encoded items and assumes that providing a forget cue after study of some items (e.g., list 1) resets the encoding process and makes encoding of subsequent items (e.g., early list 2 items) as effective as encoding of previously studied (e.g., early list 1) items. The review provides an overview of current evidence for the ROE hypothesis. The evidence arose from recent behavioral, neuroscientific, and modeling studies that examined LMDF on both an item and a list level basis. The findings support the view that ROE plays a critical role for the list 2 enhancement effect in LMDF. Alternative explanations of the effect and the generalizability of ROE to other experimental tasks are discussed.

Home | Suchen | Veröffentlichen | Hilfe | Viewer