Suche   SiteMap
Home
A bis Z
BIB-KAT
Andere Bibliothekskataloge
Digitale Medien
Dokumentlieferung
Fachspezifische Informationen
Suchhilfen und Datenbanken
 
Eingang zum Volltext in OPUS

Hinweis zum Urheberrecht

Dissertation zugänglich unter
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:385-1745
URL: http://ubt.opus.hbz-nrw.de/volltexte/2004/174/


Transformation, Reflexion und Heterogenität. Eine Untersuchung zu den Deutungsperspektiven der Kunst in der Philosophie Ernst Cassirers

Transformation, Reflexion and Heterogeneity. An Investigation into the Perspectives of Art in the Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer

Küker, Andreas

pdf-Format:
Dokument 1.pdf (585 KB) Dokument 2.pdf (6 KB) Dokument 3.pdf (4 KB)

Bookmark bei Connotea Bookmark bei del.icio.us
SWD-Schlagwörter: Cassirer, Ernst , Ästhetik
Freie Schlagwörter (Englisch): Aesthetics , Ernst Cassirer , Art , Philosophy
Institut: Philosophie
Fakultät: Fachbereich 1
DDC-Sachgruppe: Philosophie
Dokumentart: Dissertation
Hauptberichter: Orth, Ernst Wolfgang; Prof. Dr. Ernst Wolfgang
Sprache: Deutsch
Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 29.03.1999
Erstellungsjahr: 2000
Publikationsdatum: 08.06.2004
Kurzfassung auf Deutsch: n.a.
Kurzfassung auf Englisch: Summary Art, seen under the perspective of literature as an independent mode of human articulation, provides decisive motives for Cassirer's Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. The concept of art as a symbolic form opens up two fields of inquiry. On the one hand Cassirer did not actually carry out his intended systematic presentation of art as a symbolic form. On the other hand Cassirer develops his concept of art's autonomy as an indepedent form of grasping the world by conceptually linking (poetic) art with philosophy. The concepts of transformation, reflexion and heterogeneity denote characteristics of the method - not made explicit by Cassirer himself - through the cultural process becomes evident and can be interpreted as a process of becoming as movement toward Being. With the help of Cassirer's line-example it can be shown how this perspective, which manifests itself in the sense-generating force of regarding the world, is already materially given in the mere process of human perception. Language, myth and science, but also art, are different symbolic forms, which in regard to the essential function of perception turn out to be unfaling elements of the whole cultural process. Owing to the ability of the style-function of art to make transparent the performance of the symbol and with that the dynamics of culture, Cassirer in citing Rückert and Kleist can delimit the critical claim from sceptical and dogmatical positions.

Home | Suchen | Veröffentlichen | Hilfe | Viewer