- Treffer 1 von 1
Ordinary judges as constitutional judges: Norway
- The World's second oldest system of judicial review of national legislation emerged through court practice from the very first years after the adoption of the Constitution of Norway in 1814. The review is exercised by the ordinary courts at all levels with the single Supreme Court as the last instance. No specialized constitutional court has been established. The independence of the judiciary is generally recognized as high. But what degree of legitimacy should judges appointed in order to ensure ordinary judicial business enjoy when exercising a basically political function like reviewing and possibly setting aside acts of Parliament?
Verfasserangaben: | Eivind Smith |
---|---|
URN: | urn:nbn:de:hbz:385-1-14044 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.25353/ubtr-xxxx-28cd-e8fc |
ISSN: | 1616-8828 |
Schriftenreihe (Bandnummer): | Rechtspolitisches Forum (80) |
Verlagsort: | Trier |
Herausgeber: | Prof. Dr. Thomas Raab, Prof. Dr. Antje von Ungern-Sternberg |
Sonstige beteiligte Person(en): | Camilla Haake, Thomas Kemper |
Dokumentart: | Teil eines Buches (Kapitel) |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Datum der Fertigstellung: | 16.04.2019 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung: | 16.04.2019 |
Veröffentlichende Institution: | Universität Trier |
Datum der Freischaltung: | 12.10.2020 |
Freies Schlagwort / Tag: | Rechtsvergleichung; Verfassungsrecht |
GND-Schlagwort: | Norwegen; Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit |
Seitenzahl: | 23 |
Institute: | Fachbereich 5 |
Lizenz (Deutsch): | CC BY-NC-ND: Creative-Commons-Lizenz 4.0 International |