Toni Adscheid

• Transnational protest movements continue to expose the enduring legacies of colonial exploitation and institutionalised racism within and beyond European cities. They foreground the systemic conditions under which Black lives are rendered disproportionately vulnerable to premature death. In doing so, they expose the enduring entanglements of racial capitalism, state violence and spatial exclusion. Through their ongoing political agitation these movements highlight the need for spatio-temporally situated and relationally embedded engagements with Black urban lives. My thesis responds to that call by examining place-making practices of enclosure and refusal throughout Black London’s post-World War II development. Grounded in the ethnographic narrative of “being halfway while shooting”, I explore how Black lives are enclosed by institutional racism, how this enclosure is spatialised and how Black and differently racialised Londoners refuse these spatial enclosures through everyday and collective place-making practices. At the intersection of structural constraint and the desire to enact Black freedom in London, I specifically foreground the emergence of fugitive place-making practices. Conceptually, I bring (critical) urban geography scholarship, Black studies and Black (British)Geographies scholarship into conversation. I develop “being halfway while shooting” as a relational concept that foregrounds the production of racialised urban knowledges, the multiplicity of Black enclosures, and the plurality of place-based strategies committed to refusal. I do so by stressing the relevance of Black fugitive thinking to account for the ongoing refusals that mark the relationship between Blackness and the British city. Methodologically, I adopt a research-activist ethnographic approach, grounded in my long-term engagement with a housing campaign in East London that organises around the housing needs of London’s racialised and gendered urban poor. Using qualitative methods - archival research, interviews, (non-)participant observations, document and media analysis - I embed contemporary struggles into long and ongoing histories of racial-capitalist urban development as well as Black and multi-ethnic refusal. The empirical chapters trace place-making practices of enclosure and refusal across London’s post-World War II urban development. By examining the aftermath of urban revolts and changing urban welfare regimes, I explore how racialised urban governance has been historically materialised in and through the city. At the same time, I foreground how within this racialised construction of the British city, Black and differently racialised Londoners continue to hold open the possibility of refusal through places in which communal care and self-determination can be enacted. I then turn to the struggle over housing in East London, showing how contemporary processes of racialised dehumanisation and ongoing displacement are both historically rooted and actively contested. In the final empirical chapter I accentuate the relevance of these findings for German-speaking critical urban geography debates. The research shows that racial capitalist urbanism reproduces enclosures through practices of value extraction, spatial displacement, and the policing of Black subjectivities. In response, Black and differently racialised Londoners engage in fugitive place-making. Rooted in communal care, political organisation, collective education and cultural affirmation, these practices reassert Black presence and belonging. They offer an enduring mode of place-based refusal and the ongoing possibility to stay in the city differently. These findings not only demonstrate the academic significance of my research but also underscore the urgent need to support the place-making practices of Black and differently racialised urban communities, who continue to refuse the racialised enclosure of the British city from within. From these empirical insights, I propose the concept of a fugitive sense of place - a theoretical lens that accounts for the racialised reproduction of urban space and the transformative place-making practices of those who refuse its logics. Rather than offering prescriptive policy recommendations, I call for a reorientation of urban geographical enquiry by centring Black spatial practices, knowledges and imaginations. Through the lens of “being halfway while shooting”, I argue for a rethinking of human habitation and urban theory through the lived experiences of Black survival and refusal. Attending to a fugitive sense of place, I propose new avenues for human geography research to explore how fugitive place-making practices reshape the meanings, conditions, and possibilities of urban life.