• search hit 7 of 1108
Back to Result List

Ordinary judges as constitutional judges: Norway

  • The World's second oldest system of judicial review of national legislation emerged through court practice from the very first years after the adoption of the Constitution of Norway in 1814. The review is exercised by the ordinary courts at all levels with the single Supreme Court as the last instance. No specialized constitutional court has been established. The independence of the judiciary is generally recognized as high. But what degree of legitimacy should judges appointed in order to ensure ordinary judicial business enjoy when exercising a basically political function like reviewing and possibly setting aside acts of Parliament?

Download full text files

  • Der Beitrag beruht auf dem an der Universität Trier am 21. Januar 2019 im Rahmen eines Rechtspolitischen Kolloquiums frei gehaltenen Vortrag. Das Kolloquium war Teil der vierteiligen Ringvorlesung „Rechtsstaatsprinzip vs. Demokratie“.

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Eivind Smith
URN:urn:nbn:de:hbz:385-1-14044
DOI:https://doi.org/10.25353/ubtr-xxxx-28cd-e8fc
ISSN:1616-8828
Series (Volume no.):Rechtspolitisches Forum (80)
Place of publication:Trier
Editor:Prof. Dr. Thomas Raab, Prof. Dr. Antje von Ungern-Sternberg
Contributor(s):Camilla Haake, Thomas Kemper
Document Type:Part of Periodical
Language:English
Date of completion:2019/04/16
Date of publication:2019/04/16
Publishing institution:Universität Trier
Release Date:2020/10/12
Tag:Rechtsvergleichung; Verfassungsrecht
GND Keyword:Norwegen; Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit
Number of pages:23
Institutes:Fachbereich 5
Licence (German):License LogoCC BY-NC-ND: Creative-Commons-Lizenz 4.0 International

$Rev: 13581 $