Refine
Document Type
- Book (15) (remove)
Language
- English (15) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (15) (remove)
Keywords
- Folter (2)
- Strafrecht (2)
- Strafverfahren (2)
- Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit (2)
- Vernehmung (2)
- criminal law (2)
- Anglistik (1)
- Eigentum (1)
- English studies (1)
- European Convention on Human Rights (1)
- European Court of Human Rights (1)
- Finanzkrise (1)
- Führungskraft (1)
- Gerechtigkeit (1)
- German Federal Constitution (1)
- German criminal law (1)
- Griechenland (1)
- Hong Kong (1)
- Hongkong (1)
- Integration (1)
- Islamic Banking (1)
- Islamic Finance (1)
- Islamische Bank (1)
- Islamisches Finanzwesen (1)
- Kanada (1)
- Kanon / Literatur (1)
- Korea (1)
- Korean Civil Code (1)
- Kultur (1)
- Lettland / Verfassung <1991> (1)
- Literary discourse (1)
- Menschenrecht (1)
- Peer-Review (1)
- Privatrecht (1)
- Property Law (1)
- Recht <Motiv> (1)
- Rechtsphilosophie (1)
- Rechtspolitik (1)
- Rechtsreform (1)
- Rechtsstaatsprinzip (1)
- Rechtstheorie (1)
- Reform (1)
- Reforms (1)
- Scharia (1)
- Sharia (1)
- Spanien (1)
- Strafbarkeit (1)
- Strafjustiz (1)
- Südafrika <Staat> (1)
- Verfassungsrecht (1)
- Wissenschaftlich Zeitschrift (1)
- Zeitschrifteninhaltsanalyse (1)
- academic article (1)
- canon formation (1)
- career formation (1)
- civil law (1)
- common law (1)
- criminal liability (1)
- culture (1)
- discipline (1)
- diversity (1)
- equal distribution (1)
- financial crisis (1)
- human rights (1)
- integration (1)
- knowledge formation (1)
- law reform commissions (1)
- manager (1)
- overloading of criminal justice (1)
- peer-reviewed journal (1)
- secondary party (1)
- subprime mortgage (1)
- Überlastung (1)
Institute
- Rechtswissenschaft (10)
- Anglistik (1)
Subject of this publication is torture as an interrogational instrument in criminal proceedings from a legal history point of view. Thereby, the paper at hand is the continuation of Volume I (published in 2014, number 68 of the Legal Policy Forum).
Volume II covers the following historical periods: Late Middle Ages and Early Modern Age; the latter ending with the 18th century as the so called Century of Enlightenment, being the actual beginning of the Modern Age in criminal law and criminal procedure law.
The paper ends with critical remarks against the predominant view that the torture's reign of terror in the former inquisitionsprozess merely was the inevitable consequence of the unreasonable kaw on evidence applicable at that time.
Major threats to the Spanish Constitutional Court’s independence and authority have come, first, from political parties and the media and, second, by the Catalonian secession movement. The authority and the legitimacy of the Constitutional Court were tested in the stormy
proceedings on the Statute of Autonomy of Catalonia of 2006 that ended in 2010 and, above all, in the period of 2013–2017, when successive acts directed at the secession of were recurrently Catalonia challenged before the Court and subsequently overturned, and to stop the continued disobedience its rulings the of Court was given extended execution powers for its judgments. These new powers include the temporary replacement of any authority or public official that does not comply with a Court’s ruling and the ordering of a substitutive execution through the central government. The Court declared the new powers to be consistent with the Constitution (with three dissenting votes by four constitutional judges) and it even used them for the first time to enforce its prohibition of the referendum on the independence of Catalonia of 1 October 2017. Nevertheless, the Venice Commission has raised doubts about the opportunity of those powers, which are unusual in European constitutional jurisdiction models. At the end, the Court’s powers were not enough to stop the Catalonian secession process, and on 27 October 2017 the state government implemented the federal coercion clause and suspended Catalonian autonomy until new elections were held.
Although geographically it belongs to Europe, as far as the constitutionality control of the statutory provisions is concerned, Greece follows the American system. That means that there is no Constitutional Court and, on the contrary, every court (even those of first instance) are entitled, and indeed obliged, to control the constitutionality of the laws (Articles 87 par. 2 and 93 par. 4 of the Greek Constitution). The Greek Courts examine only the substantial and not the formal constitutionality of the statutory provisions. If a court comes to the result of the unconstitutionality, then the statutory provision is not annulled and removed from the legal order, but it is not applied by the court in the relevant court procedure. The only – rather rare – case where a statutory provision is erga omnes annulled is when this is ordered by a decision of the Highest Special Court (Article 100 of the Greek Constitution), following a disagreement between two of the three highest Courts, namely between Symvoulio tis Epikrateias (highest Administrative Court), Areios Pagos (Cassations Court in Civil and Criminal procedures) and Elegtiko Synedrio (Court of Audit).
The presentation is going to examine the origins of the Greek system of the constitutionality control. It will also focus on the advantages and disadvantages of the Greek system and on the scientific and political discussion. Last but not least, the presentation will examine the role of the Council of State, which, although formally not a Constitutional Court, in practice issues the vast majority of the court decisions which accept the unconstitutionality of statutory provisions.
Subject of this publication is torture as an interrogational instrument in criminal proceedings from a legal history point of view. Thereby, the author makes a distinction between torturing the accused on the one hand and, on the other hand, torture as an instrument to force a witness' incriminating testimony against third parties (in German: Zeugenfolter), torture as a means to avert dangers (lifesaving torture), torture as an additional cruelty to the accused's punishment (in German: Straffolter), and corporal punlishment for lying in a court. Only the first manifestation, namely torturing the accused intending to extort his confession, is the real subject of this paper.
In his article, the author asks how legitimacy of law and the concept of rules of law can be described taking into account the interaction between aspects of philosophy and sociology as well as the will of the state in states' constitutions. As the rule of law, versus other kinds of rules in our society, should be regarded as a rule of &amp;quot;three-dimensionality&amp;quot; " an interaction between the will of the state, the social, historical, and economic factors, and the idea or concept of justice ", the author focuses his interest on the examination of these three factors always taking into account that law is the will of the state, but that not every decision of the state can be considered as law.
The article deals with the untenable overloading of German criminal trial court judges presenting the overloading in detail and analyzing its reasons and consequences. In this context, serious failures by the German federal and state executive and legislative organs as well as undesirable developments of the Federal Constitutional Court's (BVerfG and the Federal Supreme Court of Justice's BGH) case law.
Contents: I. History of the Korean Civil Code II. Background for Initiation of the Amendment of the Civil Code (Property Law) and their Progress III. Fundamental Direction of the Amendment of the Civil Code (Property Law) IV. Major Foreign Statutes Used as Reference for the Amendment of the Civil Code (Property Law) V. Major Details of the Amendment of the Civil Code (Property Law) VI. Concluding Remarks: Evaluation
"Culture", in addition to its ethnic signification, can also express various groups' and communities' political and economic situation in society. As well as signifying the accommodation of ethnic diversity, the integration of dissimilar cultures in South Africa has to do with both the former oppressors and the formerly oppressed coming to terms with the oppression of the past, and with the equitable distribution of material means. Constitutional and other legal means have been designed to facilitate a process of integration dealing with the abovementioned issues. Some of these measures will be looked at. The speaker will argue that the integration of different cultures in South Africa cannot and will not be achieved if the law is invoked, in a strong arm fashion, trying to concoct a melting pot. The law can do no more than aiding the facilitation of a process of consolidation as precondition to nation building. Deep-seated, cultural differences among various sections of the population cannot and should not be denied or simply thought away.
The Constitution of Latvia
(2004)
The article offers a concise view on the constitution of the Baltic state of Latvia. After an introduction focusing on constitutional history, the author explores basic principles and human rights in the text of the constitution and explains the main constitutional bodies and their functions in legislative, executive and judiciary. Chapters on citizenship and religious rights round up this introduction to the Latvian Constitution.