The distractor-response binding effect (Frings & Rothermund, 2011; Frings, Rothermund, & Wentura, 2007; Rothermund, Wentura, & De Houwer, 2005) is based on the idea that irrelevant information will be integrated with the response to the relevant stimuli in an episodic memory trace. The immediate re-encounter of any aspect of this saved episode " be it relevant or irrelevant " can lead to retrieval of the whole episode. As a consequence, the previously executed and now retrieved response may influencing the response to the current relevant stimulus. That is, the current response may either be facilitated or be impaired by the retrieved response, depending on whether it is compatible or incompatible to the currently demanded response. Previous research on this kind of episodic retrieval focused on the influence on action control. I examined if distractor response binding also plays a role in decision making in addition to action control. To this end I adapted the distractor-to-distractor priming paradigm (Frings et al., 2007) and conducted nine experiments in which participants had to decide as fast as possible which disease a fictional patient suffered from. To infer the correct diagnosis, two cues were presented; one did not give any hint for a disease (the irrelevant cue), whereas the other did (the relevant cue). Experiments 1a to 1c showed that the distractor-response binding effect is present in deterministic decision situations. Further, experiments 2a and 2b indicate that distractor-response binding also influences decisions under uncertainty. Finally, experiments 3a to 3d were conducted to test some constraints and underlying mechanisms of the distractor-response binding effect in decision making under uncertainty. In sum, these nine experiments provide strong evidence that distractor-response binding influences decision making.
Fast and Slow Effects of Cortisol on Several Functions of the Central Nervous System in Humans
(2014)
Cortisol is one of the key substances released during stress to restore homeostasis. Our knowledge of the impact of this glucocorticoid on cognition and behavior in humans is, however, still limited. Two modes of action of cortisol are known, a rapid, nongenomic and a slow, genomic mode. Both mechanisms appear to be involved in mediating the various effects of stress on cognition. Here, three experiments are presented that investigated fast and slow effects of cortisol on several functions of the human brain. The first experiment investigated the interaction between insulin and slow, genomic cortisol effects on resting regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in 48 young men. A bilateral, locally distinct increase in rCBF in the insular cortex was observed 37 to 58 minutes after intranasal insulin admission. Cortisol did not influence rCBF, neither alone nor in interaction with insulin. This finding suggests that cortisol does not influence resting cerebral blood flow within a genomic timeframe. The second experiment examined fast cortisol effects on memory retrieval. 40 participants (20 of them female) learned associations between neutral male faces and social descriptions and were tested for recall one week later. Cortisol administered intravenously 8 minutes before retrieval influenced recall performance in an inverted U-shaped dose-response relationship. This study demonstrates a rapid, presumably nongenomic cortisol effect on memory retrieval in humans. The third experiment studied rapid cortisol effects on early multisensory integration. 24 male participants were tested twice in a focused cross-modal choice reaction time paradigm, once after cortisol and once after placebo infusion. Cortisol acutely enhanced the integration of visual targets and startling auditory distractors, when both stimuli appeared in the same sensory hemi-field. The rapidity of effect onset strongly suggests that cortisol changes multisensory integration by a nongenomic mechanism. The work presented in this thesis highlights the essential role of cortisol as a fast acting agent during the stress response. Both the second and the third experiment provide new evidence of nongenomic cortisol effects on human cognition and behavior. Future studies should continue to investigate the impact of rapid cortisol effects on the functioning of the human brain.