Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (904)
- Article (391)
- Book (118)
- Contribution to a Periodical (114)
- Working Paper (65)
- Part of a Book (51)
- Part of Periodical (39)
- Conference Proceedings (18)
- Other (15)
- Master's Thesis (11)
- Review (10)
- Habilitation (6)
- Course Material (3)
- Report (3)
- Bachelor Thesis (2)
- Lecture (2)
- Retro digitized Object (2)
- Examination Thesis (1)
- Magister's Thesis (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (1756) (remove)
Keywords
- Deutschland (102)
- Luxemburg (54)
- Schule (40)
- Stress (40)
- Schüler (35)
- Modellierung (30)
- Politischer Unterricht (30)
- Demokratie (29)
- Fernerkundung (25)
- Geschichte (25)
Institute
- Psychologie (226)
- Raum- und Umweltwissenschaften (213)
- Fachbereich 2 (189)
- Politikwissenschaft (140)
- Universitätsbibliothek (84)
- Fachbereich 4 (80)
- Rechtswissenschaft (77)
- Fachbereich 3 (68)
- Mathematik (67)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (66)
- Fachbereich 6 (65)
- Medienwissenschaft (57)
- Geschichte, mittlere und neuere (45)
- Fachbereich 1 (43)
- Informatik (33)
- Germanistik (28)
- Kunstgeschichte (23)
- Anglistik (20)
- Soziologie (20)
- Computerlinguistik und Digital Humanities (11)
- Philosophie (10)
- Romanistik (9)
- Fachbereich 5 (7)
- Ethnologie (6)
- Pädagogik (6)
- Allgemeine Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft (5)
- Geschichte, alte (5)
- Klassische Philologie (4)
- Sinologie (4)
- Biogeographie (3)
- Bodenkunde (3)
- Japanologie (3)
- Archäologie (2)
- Institut für Rechtspolitik (2)
- Pflegewissenschaft (2)
- Phonetik (2)
- Servicezentrum eSciences (2)
- Biopsychologie (1)
- Erziehungs- und Bildungswissenschaften (1)
- Forschungszentrum Europa (1)
- Hydrologie (1)
- Slavistik (1)
- Theologische Fakultät (1)
In this digitized age, we witness a transnational interest in the ‘aesthetics of imperfection’ – aesthetic gestures that foreground shortcomings, mistakes, and flaws. Blockbusters shot with cheap cameras, trash fashion, consciously blurry photos, glitch music: for the cultural producers and consumers of these and other aesthetic practices, the unpolished object is not a taboo but rather an asset or a hallmark of sincerity, authenticity, and other positive values. With the help of existing scholarship, in this article, I will study and compare the writings of three Russian poets/artists: Vera Khlebnikova, Vera Pavlova, and Linor Goralik. Each uses conceptual as well as formal, grammatical, and/or stylistic imperfections as an aesthetic device. The aim of my analysis is to juxtapose and historically contextualize the social anxieties that inform these and other present-day creative practices that foreground the imperfect.