Aggression is one of the most researched topics in psychology. This is understandable, since aggression behavior does a lot of harm to individuals and groups. A lot is known already about the biology of aggression, but one system that seems to be of vital importance in animals has largely been overlooked: the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Menno Kruk and Jószef Haller and their research teams developed rodent models of adaptive, normal, and abnormal aggressive behavior. They found the acute HPA axis (re)activity, but also chronic basal levels to be causally relevant in the elicitation and escalation of aggressive behavior. As a mediating variable, changes in the processing of relevant social information is proposed, although this could not be tested in animals. In humans, not a lot of research has been done, but there is evidence for both the association between acute and basal cortisol levels in (abnormal) aggression. However, not many of these studies have been experimental of nature. rnrnOur aim was to add to the understanding of both basal chronic levels of HPA axis activity, as well as acute levels in the formation of aggressive behavior. Therefore, we did two experiments, both with healthy student samples. In both studies we induced aggression with a well validated paradigm from social psychology: the Taylor Aggression Paradigm. Half of the subjects, however, only went through a non-provoking control condition. We measured trait basal levels of HPA axis activity on three days prior. We took several cortisol samples before, during, and after the task. After the induction of aggression, we measured the behavioral and electrophysiological brain response to relevant social stimuli, i.e., emotional facial expressions embedded in an emotional Stroop task. In the second study, we pharmacologically manipulated cortisol levels 60min before the beginning of the experiment. To do that, half of the subjects were administered 20mg of hydrocortisone, which elevates circulating cortisol levels (cortisol group), the other half was administered a placebo (placebo group). Results showed that acute HPA axis activity is indeed relevant for aggressive behavior. We found in Study 1 a difference in cortisol levels after the aggression induction in the provoked group compared to the non-provoked group (i.e., a heightened reactivity of the HPA axis). However, this could not be replicated in Study 2. Furthermore, the pharmacological elevation of cortisol levels led to an increase in aggressive behavior in women compared to the placebo group. There were no effects in men, so that while men were significantly more aggressive than women in the placebo group, they were equally aggressive in the cortisol group. Furthermore, there was an interaction of cortisol treatment with block of the Taylor Aggression Paradigm, in that the cortisol group was significantly more aggressive in the third block of the task. Concerning basal HPA axis activity, we found an effect on aggressive behavior in both studies, albeit more consistently in women and in the provoked and non-provoked groups. However, the effect was not apparent in the cortisol group. After the aggressive encounter, information processing patterns were changed in the provoked compared to the non-provoked group for all facial expressions, especially anger. These results indicate that the HPA axis plays an important role in the formation of aggressive behavior in humans, as well. Importantly, different changes within the system, be it basal or acute, are associated with the same outcome in this task. More studies are needed, however, to better understand the role that each plays in different kinds of aggressive behavior, and the role information processing plays as a possible mediating variable. This extensive knowledge is necessary for better behavioral interventions.

This work addresses the algorithmic tractability of hard combinatorial problems. Basically, we are considering \NP-hard problems. For those problems we can not find a polynomial time algorithm. Several algorithmic approaches already exist which deal with this dilemma. Among them we find (randomized) approximation algorithms and heuristics. Even though in practice they often work in reasonable time they usually do not return an optimal solution. If we constrain optimality then there are only two methods which suffice for this purpose: exponential time algorithms and parameterized algorithms. In the first approach we seek to design algorithms consuming exponentially many steps who are more clever than some trivial algorithm (who simply enumerates all solution candidates). Typically, the naive enumerative approach yields an algorithm with run time $\Oh^*(2^n)$. So, the general task is to construct algorithms obeying a run time of the form $\Oh^*(c^n)$ where $c<2$. The second approach considers an additional parameter $k$ besides the input size $n$. This parameter should provide more information about the problem and cover a typical characteristic. The standard parameterization is to see $k$ as an upper (lower, resp.) bound on the solution size in case of a minimization (maximization, resp.) problem. Then a parameterized algorithm should solve the problem in time $f(k)\cdot n^\beta$ where $\beta$ is a constant and $f$ is independent of $n$. In principle this method aims to restrict the combinatorial difficulty of the problem to the parameter $k$ (if possible). The basic hypothesis is that $k$ is small with respect to the overall input size. In both fields a frequent standard technique is the design of branching algorithms. These algorithms solve the problem by traversing the solution space in a clever way. They frequently select an entity of the input and create two new subproblems, one where this entity is considered as part of the future solution and another one where it is excluded from it. Then in both cases by fixing this entity possibly other entities will be fixed. If so then the traversed number of possible solution is smaller than the whole solution space. The visited solutions can be arranged like a search tree. To estimate the run time of such algorithms there is need for a method to obtain tight upper bounds on the size of the search trees. In the field of exponential time algorithms a powerful technique called Measure&Conquer has been developed for this purpose. It has been applied successfully to many problems, especially to problems where other algorithmic attacks could not break the trivial run time upper bound. On the other hand in the field of parameterized algorithms Measure&Conquer is almost not known. This piece of work will present examples where this technique can be used in this field. It also will point out what differences have to be made in order to successfully apply the technique. Further, exponential time algorithms for hard problems where Measure&Conquer is applied are presented. Another aspect is that a formalization (and generalization) of the notion of a search tree is given. It is shown that for certain problems such a formalization is extremely useful.

Die Arbeit beschäftigt sich mit der Interaktion zwischen den Juden des Regnum Teutonicum und den verschiedenen Herrschaftsträgern, mit denen die Juden in Kontakt kamen. Dies waren neben dem König auch geistliche und weltliche Landes- und Stadtherren. Chronologisch an vier Herrschaftsphasen Rudolfs ausgerichtet, analysiert die Studie sämtliche überlieferte schriftliche Zeugnisse, um insbesondere der Frage nach der Bedeutung der Kammerknechtschaft im Reich nachzugehen. Diese stellt sich als höchst ambivalente und keinesfalls nur negative Beziehungsform heraus, die zudem nur in einem europäischen Kontext verständlich wird.

During and after application, pesticides enter the atmosphere by volatilisation and by wind erosion of particles on which the pesticide is sorbed. Measurements at application sites revealed that sometimes more than half of the amount applied is lost into the atmosphere within a few days. The atmosphere is an important part of the hydrologic cycle that can transport pesticides from their point of application and deposit them into aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems far from their point of use. In the region of Trier pesticides are widely used. In order to protect crops from pests and increase crop yields in the viniculture, six to eight pesticide applications take place between May and August. The impact that these applications have on the environmental pollution of the region is not yet well understood. The present study was developed to characterize the atmospheric presence, temporal patterns, transport and deposition of a variety of pesticides in the atmosphere of the area of Trier. To this purpose, rain samples were weekly collected at eight sites during the growing seasons 2000, 2001 and 2002, and air samples (gas and particle phases) were collected during the growing season 2002. Multiresidue analysis methods were developed to determine multiple classes of pesticides in rain water, particle- and gas-phase samples. Altogether 24 active ingredients and 3 metabolites were chosen as representative substances, focussing mainly on fungicides. Twenty-four of the 27 measured pesticides were detected in the rain samples; seventeen pesticides were detected in the air samples. The most frequently detected pesticides and at the highest concentrations, both in rain and air, were compounds belonging to the class of fungicides. The insecticide methyl parathion was also detected in several rain samples as well as two substances that are banned in Germany, such as the herbicides atrazine and simazine. Concentration levels varied during the growing season with the highest concentrations being measured in the late spring and summer months, coinciding with application times and warmer months. Concentration levels measured in the rain samples were, generally, in the order of rnng l-1. Though average concentrations for single substances were less than 100 ng l-1, total concentrations were considerable and in some instances well above the EU drinking water quality standard of 500 ng l-1 for total pesticides. Compared to the amounts applied for pest control, the amounts deposited by rain resulted between 0,004% and 0,10% of the maximum application rates. These low pesticide inputs from precipitation to surface-water bodies is not of concern in vinicultural areas where the impact of other sources, such as superficial runoff inputs from the treated areas and cleaning of field crop sprayers, is more important. However, the potential impacts of these aerial pesticide inputs to non-target sites, such as organic crops, and sensitive ecosystems are as yet not known. Concentration levels in the air samples were in the order of ng m-3 at sites close to the fields were pesticides were applied, while lower values, in the order of pg m-3, were detected at the site located further away from fields where applications were performed. The measured air concentration levels found in this study do not represent a concern for human health in terms of acute risk. Inhalation toxicity studies have shown that an acute potential risk only arises at air concentrations in the range of g m-3. Finally, it must be kept in mind that only a small number of chemicals that were applied in the area were analysed for in this study. In order to gain a better evaluation of the local atmospheric load of pesticides, a wider spectrum of applied substances (including metabolites) needs to be investigated.

Markenaufbau von Destinationen ist eine kostenintensive und langfristige Angelegenheit. In den vergangenen Jahren stieg das Interesse von Kommunen, Regionen und Ländern die Markenbildung zu verstärken. Gleichzeitig wird aber auch immer mehr der Ruf lauter ein Instrument zu schaffen, das Markenbewertung für Destinationen vornimmt. Vor allem in der Konsumgüter und Investitionsgüterindustrie finden sich zahlreiche Ansätze zur Markenbewertung, im Destinationsmanagement gibt es das bisher kaum. Es gibt drei verschiedene Arten von Verfahren, die meist von Unternehmensberatungen oder Wissenschaftlern entwickelt wurden: Messung des Markenwertes, Messung der Markenstärke und hybride Verfahren. Für Destinationen machen rein quantitative Verfahren wenig Sinn, da es beim Thema "Reise" auch auf eine Vielzahl von qualitativen Merkmalen ankommt. Von daher wurde im Rahmen dieser Dissertation entschieden, sich primär auf ein qualitatives Verfahren zu konzentrieren und verschiedene Modelle der Markenbewertung zu überprüfen. Das Resultat der Überprüfung zeigte, dass es notwendig war verschiedene Modelle zu kombinieren, um damit die Markenstärke einer Destination zu messen. Als empirisches Beispiel wurde hier Spanien ausgewählt, da dies als ein erfolgreiches Beispiel für Branding in der Fachliteratur gesehen wird. Dieses neu entwickelte Verfahren wurde an der Destination Spanien überprüft im Rahmen einer Projektstudie mit Studierenden der Universität Trier. Das Ergebnis zeigte, dass der Ansatz eines qualitativen Verfahrens richtig war, allerdings könnte es in ein hybrides Verfahren überführt werden. Kooperationspartner für die Dissertation war Turespana, Berlin.