Filtern
Schlagworte
- selective attention (3) (entfernen)
Cognitive performance is contingent upon multiple factors. Beyond the impact of en-vironmental circumstances, the bodily state may hinder or promote cognitive processing. Af-ferent transmission from the viscera, for instance, is crucial not only for the genesis of affect and emotion, but further exerts significant influences on memory and attention. In particular, afferent cardiovascular feedback from baroreceptors demonstrated subcortical and cortical inhibition. Consequences for human cognition and behavior are the impairment of simple perception and sensorimotor functioning. Four studies are presented that investigate the mod-ulatory impact of baro-afferent feedback on selective attention. The first study demonstrates that the modulation of sensory processing by baroreceptor activity applies to the processing of complex stimulus configurations. By the use of a visual masking task in which a target had to be selected against a visual mask, perceptual interference was reduced when target and mask were presented during the ventricular systole compared to the diastole. In study two, selection efficiency was systematically manipulated in a visual selection task in which a target letter was flanked by distracting stimuli. By comparing participants" performance under homogene-ous and heterogeneous stimulus conditions, selection efficiency was assessed as a function of the cardiac cycle phase in which the targets and distractors were presented. The susceptibility of selection performance to the stimulus condition at hand was less pronounced during the ventricular systole compared to the diastole. Study one and two therefore indicate that inter-ference from irrelevant sensory input, resulting from temporally overlapping processing traces or from the simultaneous presentation of distractor stimuli, is reduced during phases of in-creased baro-afferent feedback. Study three experimentally manipulated baroreceptor activity by systematically varying the participant- body position while a sequential distractor priming task was completed. In this study, negative priming and distractor-response binding effects were obtained as indices of controlled and automatic distractor processing, respectively. It was found that only controlled distractor processing was affected by tonic increases in baro-receptor activity. In line with study one and two these results indicate that controlled selection processes are more efficient during enhanced baro-afferent feedback, observable in dimin-ished aftereffects of controlled distractor processing. Due to previous findings that indicated baro-afferent transmission to affect central, rather than response-related processing stages, study four measured lateralized-readiness potentials (LRPs) and reaction times (RTs), while participants, again, had to selectively respond to target stimuli that were surrounded by dis-tractors. The impact of distractor inhibition on stimulus-related, but not on response-related LRPs suggests that in a sequential distractor priming task, the sensory representations of dis-tractors, rather than motor responses are targeted by inhibition. Together with the results from studies one through three and the finding of baroreceptor-mediated behavioral inhibition tar-geting central processing stages, study four corroborates the presumption of baro-afferent signal transmission to modulate controlled processes involved in selective attention. In sum, the work presented shows that visual selective attention benefits from in-creased baro-afferent feedback as its effects are not confined to simple perception, but may facilitate the active suppression of neural activity related to sensory input from distractors. Hence, due to noise reduction, baroreceptor-mediated inhibition may promote effective selec-tion in vision.
Attitudes are "the most distinctive and indispensable concept in contemporary social psychology" (Allport, 1935, p. 798). This outstanding position of the attitude concept in social cognitive research is not only reflected in the innumerous studies focusing on this concept but also in the huge number of theoretical approaches that have been put forth since then. Yet, it is still an open question, what attitudes actually are. That is, the question of how attitude objects are represented in memory cannot be unequivocally answered until now (e.g., Barsalou, 1999; Gawronski, 2007; Pratkanis, 1989, Chapter 4). In particular, researchers strongly differ with respect to their assumptions on the content, format and structural nature of attitude representations (Ferguson & Fukukura, 2012). This prevailing uncertainty on what actually constitutes our likes and dislikes is strongly dovetailed with the question of which processes result in the formation of these representations. In recent years, this issue has mainly been addressed in evaluative conditioning research (EC). In a standard EC-paradigm a neutral stimulus (conditioned stimulus, CS) is repeatedly paired with an affective stimulus (unconditioned stimulus, US). The pairing of stimuli then typically results in changes in the evaluation of the CS corresponding to the evaluative response of the US (De Houwer, Baeyens, & Field, 2005). This experimental approach on the formation of attitudes has primarily been concerned with the question of how the representations underlying our attitudes are formed. However, which processes operate on the formation of such an attitude representation is not yet understood (Jones, Olson, & Fazio, 2010; Walther, Nagengast, & Trasselli, 2005). Indeed, there are several ideas on how CS-US pairs might be encoded in memory. Notwithstanding the importance of these theoretical ideas, looking at the existing empirical work within the research area of EC (for reviews see Hofmann, De Houwer, Perugini, Baeyens, & Crombez, 2010; De Houwer, Thomas, & Baeyens, 2001) leaves one with the impression that scientists have skipped the basic processes. Basic processes hereby especially refer to the attentional processes being involved in the encoding of CSs and USs as well as the relation between them. Against the background of this huge gap in current research on attitude formation, the focus of this thesis will be to highlight the contribution of selective attention processes to a better understanding of the representation underlying our likes and dislikes. In particular, the present thesis considers the role of selective attention processes for the solution of the representation issue from three different perspectives. Before illustrating these different perspectives, Chapter 1 is meant to envision the omnipresence of the representation problem in current theoretical as well as empirical work on evaluative conditioning. Likewise, it emphasizes the critical role of selective attention processes for the representation question in classical conditioning and how this knowledge might be used to put forth the uniqueness of evaluative conditioning as compared to classical conditioning. Chapter 2 then considers the differential influence of attentional resources and goal-directed attention on attitude learning. The primary objective of the presented experiment was thereby to investigate whether attentional resources and goal-directed attention exert their influence on EC via changes in the encoding of CS-US relations in memory (i.e., contingency memory). Taking the findings from this experiment into account, Chapter 3 focuses on the selective processing of the US relative to the CS. In particular, the two experiments presented in this chapter were meant to explore the moderating influence of the selective processing of the US in its relation to the CS on EC. In Chapter 4 the important role of the encoding of the US in relation to the CS, as outlined in Chapter 3, is illuminated in the context of different retrieval processes. Against the background of the findings from the two presented experiments, the interplay between the encoding of CS-US contingencies and the moderation of EC via different retrieval processes will be discussed. Finally, a general discussion of the findings, their theoretical implications and future research lines will be outlined in Chapter 5.
Wahrnehmungsprozesse werden durch Wünsche, Hoffnungen und Befürchtungen beeinflusst. Dieser Sachverhalt wird mit dem Begriff der motivierten Wahrnehmung bezeichnet. Motivierte Wahrnehmung zeigt sich im Einfluss der Stimulusvalenz auf die Sensitivität bzw. die Wahrnehmungsschwelle. Umstritten ist in diesem Zusammenhang besonders die Wahrnehmung von Stimuli mit negativer Valenz: Frühere Arbeiten gingen von einer "Wahrnehmungsabwehr" gegenüber bedrohlichen Signalen aus, während neuere Ansätze Vigilanzeffekte für negativ-valente Stimuli vorhersagen. Eine theoretische Einbettung der Phänomene der motivierten Wahrnehmung in ein Modell der Handlungsregulation erlaubt es, konkrete Hypothesen abzuleiten, wann es zu einer Sensitivierung für negative Signale und wann es zu einer Ausblendung entsprechender Stimuli kommt: Es wird vorhergesagt, dass Hinweise auf kontrollierbare Gefahren Aufmerksamkeit binden und Hinweise auf unkontrollierbare Bedrohungen dagegen im Wahrnehmungsprozess inhibiert werden. Diese Hypothese wurde in einer Reihe von sechs Computerexperimenten mit unterschiedlichen Anordnungen empirisch überprüft. Es wurde besonderer Wert darauf gelegt, methodische Probleme, die mit vielen früheren Forschungsarbeiten in diesem Bereich verbunden waren, zu vermeiden. Die zentrale Herausforderung besteht dabei darin, Wahrnehmungsprozesse von strategischen Effekten auf der Ebene der Entscheidungsfindung und von Reaktionstendenzen zu trennen. Zu diesem Zweck wurden einerseits spezielle statistische Auswertungsformate (stochastische Diffusionsmodelle; Signaldetektionstheorie) herangezogen, die es erlauben, Wahrnehmungseffekte von Reaktionstendenzen zu trennen. Andererseits wurden Paradigmen gewählt, die Antworttendenzen a priori minimierten bzw. ausschlossen. Die Ergebnisse aller sechs Experimente bestätigen die zentrale Hypothese. Wenn eine Bedrohung kontrolliert werden kann, werden negative Stimulusanteile bevorzugt wahrgenommen und die Wahrnehmungsschwelle für entsprechende Hinweise ist verringert. Umgekehrt zeigt sich eine Inhibition negativer Inhalte im Wahrnehmungsprozess und eine erhöhte Wahrnehmungsschwelle für negative Signale, die unkontrollierbare Gefahren ankündigen.