Surveys play a major role in studying social and behavioral phenomena that are difficult to observe. Survey data provide insights into the determinants and consequences of human behavior and social interactions. Many domains rely on high quality survey data for decision making and policy implementation including politics, health, business, and the social sciences. Given a certain research question in a specific context, finding the most appropriate survey design to ensure data quality and keep fieldwork costs low at the same time is a difficult task. The aim of examining survey research methodology is to provide the best evidence to estimate the costs and errors of different survey design options. The goal of this thesis is to support and optimize the accumulation and sustainable use of evidence in survey methodology in four steps: (1) Identifying the gaps in meta-analytic evidence in survey methodology by a systematic review of the existing evidence along the dimensions of a central framework in the field (2) Filling in these gaps with two meta-analyses in the field of survey methodology, one on response rates in psychological online surveys, the other on panel conditioning effects for sensitive items (3) Assessing the robustness and sufficiency of the results of the two meta-analyses (4) Proposing a publication format for the accumulation and dissemination of metaanalytic evidence