Refine
Document Type
- Working Paper (4)
- Article (1)
Keywords
- Governance (2)
- Klimaänderung (2)
- Nachhaltigkeit (2)
- Tourismus (2)
- Traben-Trarbach Region (2)
- Weinbau (2)
- Anpassung (1)
- Diskursanalyse (1)
- Energie (1)
- Entwicklungsländer (1)
Institute
In a first step, this paper analyses the emergence of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as new global development framework with regard to key actors, social learning cycles, innovation platforms, fundamental policy changes and transition dynamics towards sustainability. In a second step, it traces the convolution of social, political and environmental dimensions, social power relations and governance paradigms embedded in the drafting process and final framework of the water related SDG 6. This research concludes that the SDGs induced important paradigm and policy changes in addition to rearranging existing power relations.
This literature review was conducted to identify important wetlands in the Greater Accra Region and to illustrate dominant research trends, prevailing perspectives and corresponding research gaps. Six wetlands systems were identified as most significant lagoon systems, namely the Densu Delta, Sakumo, Muni-Pomadze, Keta, Korle and Songor Lagoons. Research foci for each of the respective wetlands were extrapolated and summarized in a category system. The frequency of different categories illustrates that natural science’s perspectives dominate, as most of Accra’s lagoons have been studied with regard to their ecological, physical and chemical properties. The development of research interest over time and focus on ecological baseline conditions are related to the designation of Ramsar Sites and orientation of national policies towards environmental protection. A research gap was identified, as studies link their findings to human activities but neglect the connection between governance variables and environmental developments. It is suggested to expand the natural science’s perspective on Accra’s wetlands to account for social and political aspects in order to develop a holistic and more sustainable management strategy.
Anpassung an den Klimawandel stellt eine komplexe gesellschaftliche Herausforderung dar und hat Bezug zu steuerungstheoretischen Fragen um Governance. Klimaanpassung zeichnet sich aus durch die Zusammenarbeit staatlicher und nicht-staatlicher Akteure, netzwerkartige Strukturen, flexible Steuerungsmechanismen sowie formelle und informelle Koordinationsstrukturen. Für die erfolgreiche Gestaltung von Klimaanpassungspolitik müssen vielfältige Akteurs- und Interessenskonstellationen berücksichtigt werden.
Ziel der vorliegenden Studie ist es, das Traben-Trarbacher Akteurs- und Stakeholdernetzwerk aus Perspektive der Klimaanpassung zu analysieren. Ein besonderer Fokus liegt hierbei auf den regionalwirtschaftlich bedeutenden Sektoren Weinbau und Tourismus, die integriert und im Kontext von kommunalen, regionalen und überregionalen Strukturen betrachtet werden. Im Rahmen der Analyse wurden das Beziehungsgeflecht, die Reichweite und Diversität des Netzwerks sowie die Zusammensetzung der Akteurslandschaft dargestellt. Darüber hinaus konnten wichtige Schlüsselakteure, potenzielle Multiplikatoren, Interdependenzen zwischen Weinbau und Tourismus sowie Informations- und Wissensquellen identifiziert werden.
Die Ergebnisse der Stakeholderanalyse geben wichtige Hinweise darauf, welche Akteure in Steuerungsprozesse von Klimaanpassung einbezogen und welche lokalen Gegebenheiten und Beziehungen hierbei berücksichtig werden müssen. Besonders die Zusammensetzung der Akteure hat entscheidenden Einfluss auf den Verlauf und Erfolg der Steuerung von Klimaanpassung. Die vorliegende Stakeholderanalyse schafft also eine wichtige Grundlage zur Etablierung eines Governance-Netzwerks für die Erarbeitung und Erprobung von Klimawandelanpassungsmaßnahmen in Traben-Trarbach und der Moselregion. Damit dient die Analyse der langfristigen Verankerung von Klimaanpassung in der Region und kann auch als Anregung für weitere Kommunen genutzt werden, die vor ähnlichen Herausforderungen stehen wie Traben-Trarbach.
In the context of accelerated global socio-environmental change, the Water-Energy-Food Nexus has received increasing attention within science and international politics by promoting integrated resource governance. This study explores the scientific nexus debates from a discourse analytical perspective to reveal knowledge and power relations as well as geographical settings of nexus research. We also investigate approaches to socio-nature relations that influence nexus research and subsequent political implications. Our findings suggest that the leading nexus discourse is dominated by natural scientific perspectives and a neo-Malthusian framing of environmental challenges. Accordingly, the promoted cross-sectoral nexus approach to resource governance emphasizes efficiency, security, future sustainability, and poverty reduction. Water, energy, and food are conceived as global trade goods that require close monitoring, management and control, to be achieved via quantitative assessments and technological interventions. Within the less visible discourse, social scientific perspectives engage with the social, political, and normative elements of the Water-Energy-Food Nexus. These perspectives criticize the dominant nexus representation for itsmanagerial, neoliberal, and utilitarian approach to resource governance. The managerial framing is critiqued for masking power relations and social inequalities, while alternative framings acknowledge the political nature of resource governance and socio-nature relations. The spatial dimensions of the nexus debate are also discussed. Notably, the nexus is largely shaped by western knowledge, yet applied mainly in specific regions of the Global South. In order for the nexus to achieve integrative solutions for sustainability, the debate needs to overcome its current discursive and spatial separations. To this end, we need to engage more closely with alternative nexus discourses, embrace epistemic pluralism and encourage multi-perspective debates about the socio-nature relations we actually intend to promote.