Filtern
Sprache
- Englisch (1) (entfernen)
Volltext vorhanden
- ja (1) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Nutzwertanalyse (1) (entfernen)
Evaluation of desalination techniques for treating the brackish water of Olushandja sub-basin
(2014)
The groundwater of Olushandja sub-basin as part of Cuvelai basin in central-northern Namibia is saline with TDS content varying between 4,000ppm to 90,000ppm. Based on climatic conditions, this region can be classified as a semi-arid to arid region with an annual rainfall during summer time varying between 200mm to 500mm. The mean annual evaporation potential is about 2,800mm, which is much higher than the annual rainfall. The southern block of this sub-basin is of low population density. It has not been covered by the supply networks for electricity and water. Therefore, the inhabitants are forced to use the untreated groundwater from the hand-dug wells for their daily purposes. This groundwater is not safe for human consumption and therefore needs to be desalinated for that purpose. The goal of this thesis has been to select a suitable desalination technology for that region. The technology to be selected is from those which use renewable energy sources, which have capacity of production from 10m3 to 100m3 per day, which are simple and robust against existing harsh environmental conditions and have already been implemented successfully in some place. Based on these criteria, the technologies which emerged from the literature are: multistage flashing (MSF), multi effect distillation (MED), multi effect humidification (MEH), membrane distillation (MD), reverse osmosis (RO) and electro dialysis reversed (ED). Out of these technologies, RO & ED are based on membrane techniques and MSF, MED & MEH use thermal processes whereas MD technology uses a hybrid process of thermal and membrane techniques for desalinating the water. For evaluation of technical performance, environmental sustainability and financial feasibility of the above mentioned desalination techniques, the following criteria have been used: gained output ratio, recovery rate, pretreatment requirements, sensitivity to feed water quality, post treatment, operating temperature, operating pressure, scaling and fouling potential, corrosion susceptibility, brine disposal, prime energy requirement, mechanical and electrical power output, heat energy, running costs and water generation costs. The data regarding the performance standards of the successfully implemented desalination techniques have been obtained from the literature of performance benchmarks. The Utility Value Analysis Tool of the Rafter-Group of Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA) has been used for measuring the performance score of a technology. To perform the utility analysis, an evaluation matrix has to be constructed through the following procedures: selection of the decision options (or assessment groups), identification of the evaluation criteria, measurement of performance and transformation of the units. Then the criteria under the objective groups are assigned a level of importance for determining their weights.To perform the sensitivity analysis the level of importance of a criterion is changed by giving more weight or rate to the assessment group of interest (or study). Within the assessment group of interests, the best performing desalination technology has been selected according to the outcome of the sensitivity analysis. The important conclusions of this study are the identification of the capabilities of thermal and membrane based small scale desalination technologies and their applicability based on site specific needs. The sensitivity analysis indicates that the MED technology is the most environmental friendly technology that uses minimum energy and produces least concentrated brine for disposal. The ED technology has emerged to be technically suitable, but it is only applicable when source water has less than 12.000 ppm salt content. The MSF process has favorable thermal efficiency and it is insensitive to feed water quality. Its major drawbacks are energy needs and post treatment requirements that affected its net score. The MD and MSF process have scored the lowest for the technical and economic assessment groups and are concluded not to be suitable for Olushandja sub-basin. The MEH process is cheaper and technically more appropriate than the MED in the two assessment groups. Based on the above mentioned evaluations, this study concluded that Olushandja sub-basin needs more data collection on the geological profile, distinctive identification of aquifers and evidence on the interaction between the aquifers. From the best available data obtained, it could not be established with certainty where the highest level of salinity can be found in the profile, or how the geological profile is layered. More data on ground water quality for spatial overview of the trends and pattern of the sub-basin will be useful in drawing better conclusion on the specific desalination technology needed which is suitable for a specified village or living space.