Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Dissertation (1) (entfernen)
Volltext vorhanden
- ja (1) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Social entrepreneurship (1) (entfernen)
Social entrepreneurship is a successful activity to solve social problems and economic
challenges. Social entrepreneurship uses for-profit industry techniques and tools to build
financially sound businesses that provide nonprofit services. Social entrepreneurial activities
also lead to the achievement of sustainable development goals. However, due to the complex,
hybrid nature of the business, social entrepreneurial activities are typically supported by macrolevel
determinants. To expand our knowledge of how beneficial macro-level determinants can
be, this work examines empirical evidence about the impact of macro-level determinants on
social entrepreneurship. Another aim of this dissertation is to examine the impact at the micro
level, as the growth ambitions of social and commercial entrepreneurs differ. At the beginning,
the introductory section is explained in Chapter 1, which contains the motivation for the
research, the research question, and the structure of the work.
There is an ongoing debate about the origin and definition of social entrepreneurship.
Therefore, the numerous phenomena of social entrepreneurship are examined theoretically in
the previous literature. To determine the common consensus on the topic, Chapter 2 presents
the theoretical foundations and definition of social entrepreneurship. The literature shows that
a variety of determinants at the micro and macro levels are essential for the emergence of social
entrepreneurship as a distinctive business model (Hartog & Hoogendoorn, 2011; Stephan et
al., 2015; Hoogendoorn, 2016). It is impossible to create a society based on a social mission without the support of micro and macro-level-level determinants. This work examines the
determinants and consequences of social entrepreneurship from different methodological
perspectives. The theoretical foundations of the micro- and macro-level determinants
influencing social entrepreneurial activities were discussed in Chapter 3
The purpose of reproducibility in research is to confirm previously published results
(Hubbard et al., 1998; Aguinis & Solarino, 2019). However, due to the lack of data, lack of
transparency of methodology, reluctance to publish, and lack of interest from researchers, there
is a lack of promoting replication of the existing research study (Baker, 2016; Hedges &
Schauer, 2019a). Promoting replication studies has been regularly emphasized in the business
and management literature (Kerr et al., 2016; Camerer et al., 2016). However, studies that
provide replicability of the reported results are considered rare in previous research (Burman
et al., 2010; Ryan & Tipu, 2022). Based on the research of Köhler and Cortina (2019), an
empirical study on this topic is carried out in Chapter 4 of this work.
Given this focus, researchers have published a large body of research on the impact of microand
macro-level determinants on social inclusion, although it is still unclear whether these
studies accurately reflect reality. It is important to provide conceptual underpinnings to the
field through a reassessment of published results (Bettis et al., 2016). The results of their
research make it abundantly clear that the macro determinants support social entrepreneurship.
In keeping with the more narrative approach, which is a crucial concern and requires attention,
Chapter 5 considered the reproducibility of previous results, particularly on the topic of social
entrepreneurship. We replicated the results of Stephan et al. (2015) to establish the trend of
reproducibility and validate the specific conclusions they drew. The literal and constructive
replication in the dissertation inspired us to explore technical replication research on social
entrepreneurship. Chapter 6 evaluates the fundamental characteristics that have proven to be key factors in the
growth of social ventures. The current debate reviews and references literature that has
specifically focused on the development of social entrepreneurship. An empirical analysis of
factors directly related to the ambitious growth of social entrepreneurship is also carried out.
Numerous social entrepreneurial groups have been studied concerning this association. Chapter
6 compares the growth ambitions of social and traditional (commercial) entrepreneurship as
consequences at the micro level. This study examined many characteristics of social and
commercial entrepreneurs' growth ambitions. Scholars have claimed to some extent that the
growth of social entrepreneurship differs from commercial entrepreneurial activities due to
objectivity differences (Lumpkin et al., 2013; Garrido-Skurkowicz et al., 2022). Qualitative
research has been used in studies to support the evidence on related topics, including Gupta et
al (2020) emphasized that research needs to focus on specific concepts of social
entrepreneurship for the field to advance. Therefore, this study provides a quantitative,
analysis-based assessment of facts and data. For this purpose, a data set from the Global
Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) 2015 was used, which examined 12,695 entrepreneurs from
38 countries. Furthermore, this work conducted a regression analysis to evaluate the influence
of various social and commercial characteristics of entrepreneurship on economic growth in
developing countries. Chapter 7 briefly explains future directions and practical/theoretical
implications.