Wirtschaftswissenschaften
Refine
Year of publication
- 2018 (3) (remove)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Keywords
- Amtliche Statistik (1)
- Crowdfunding (1)
- Crowdinvesting (1)
- Entrepreneurial Finance (1)
- Entrepreneurship (1)
- Equity Crowdfunding (1)
- Finanzierung (1)
- Nicht-linear Statistiken (1)
- Schätztheorie (1)
- Stichprobenentnahme (1)
Institute
Mittels Querschnittserhebungen ist es möglich Populationsparameter zu einem bestimmten Zeitpunkt zu schätzen. Jedoch ist meist die Veränderung von Populationsparametern von besonderem Interesse. So ist es zur Evaluation von politischen Zielvorgaben erforderlich die Veränderung von Indikatoren, wie Armutsmaßen, über die Zeit zu verfolgen. Um zu testen ob eine gemessene Veränderung sich signifikant von Null unterscheidet bedarf es einer Varianzschätzung für Veränderungen von Querschnitten. In diesem Zusammenhang ergeben sich oft zwei Probleme; Zum einen sind die relevanten Statistiken meist nicht-linear und zum anderen basieren die untersuchten Querschnittserhebungen auf Stichproben die nicht unabhängig voneinander gezogen wurden. Ziel der vorliegenden Dissertation ist es einen theoretischen Rahmen zur Herleitung und Schätzung der Varianz einer geschätzten Veränderung von nicht-linearen Statistiken zu geben. Hierzu werden die Eigenschaften von Stichprobendesigns erarbeitetet, die zur Koordination von Stichprobenziehungen in einer zeitlichen Abfolge verwendet werden. Insbesondere werden Ziehungsalgorithmen zur Koordination von Stichproben vorgestellt, erarbeitet und deren Eigenschaften beschrieben. Die Problematik der Varianzschätzung im Querschnitt für nicht-lineare Schätzer bei komplexen Stichprobendesigns wird ebenfalls behandelt. Schließlich wird ein allgemeiner Ansatz zur Schätzung von Veränderungen aufgezeigt und es werden Varianzschätzer für die Veränderung von Querschnittschätzern basierend auf koordinierten Querschnittstichproben untersucht. Insbesondere dem Fall einer sich über die Zeit verändernden Population wird eine besondere Bedeutung im Rahmen der Arbeit beigemessen, da diese im Anwendungsfall die Regel darstellen.
Surveys are commonly tailored to produce estimates of aggregate statistics with a desired level of precision. This may lead to very small sample sizes for subpopulations of interest, defined geographically or by content, which are not incorporated into the survey design. We refer to subpopulations where the sample size is too small to provide direct estimates with adequate precision as small areas or small domains. Despite the small sample sizes, reliable small area estimates are needed for economic and political decision making. Hence, model-based estimation techniques are used which increase the effective sample size by borrowing strength from other areas to provide accurate information for small areas. The paragraph above introduced small area estimation as a field of survey statistics where two conflicting philosophies of statistical inference meet: the design-based and the model-based approach. While the first approach is well suited for the precise estimation of aggregate statistics, the latter approach furnishes reliable small area estimates. In most applications, estimates for both large and small domains based on the same sample are needed. This poses a challenge to the survey planner, as the sampling design has to reflect different and potentially conflicting requirements simultaneously. In order to enable efficient design-based estimates for large domains, the sampling design should incorporate information related to the variables of interest. This may be achieved using stratification or sampling with unequal probabilities. Many model-based small area techniques require an ignorable sampling design such that after conditioning on the covariates the variable of interest does not contain further information about the sample membership. If this condition is not fulfilled, biased model-based estimates may result, as the model which holds for the sample is different from the one valid for the population. Hence, an optimisation of the sampling design without investigating the implications for model-based approaches will not be sufficient. Analogously, disregarding the design altogether and focussing only on the model is prone to failure as well. Instead, a profound knowledge of the interplay between the sample design and statistical modelling is a prerequisite for implementing an effective small area estimation strategy. In this work, we concentrate on two approaches to address this conflict. Our first approach takes the sampling design as given and can be used after the sample has been collected. It amounts to incorporate the survey design into the small area model to avoid biases stemming from informative sampling. Thus, once a model is validated for the sample, we know that it holds for the population as well. We derive such a procedure under a lognormal mixed model, which is a popular choice when the support of the dependent variable is limited to positive values. Besides, we propose a three pillar strategy to select the additional variable accounting for the design, based on a graphical examination of the relationship, a comparison of the predictive accuracy of the choices and a check regarding the normality assumptions.rnrnOur second approach to deal with the conflict is based on the notion that the design should allow applying a wide variety of analyses using the sample data. Thus, if the use of model-based estimation strategies can be anticipated before the sample is drawn, this should be reflected in the design. The same applies for the estimation of national statistics using design-based approaches. Therefore, we propose to construct the design such that the sampling mechanism is non-informative but allows for precise design-based estimates at an aggregate level.
A phenomenon of recent decades is that digital marketplaces on the Internet are establishing themselves for a wide variety of products and services. Recently, it has become possible for private individuals to invest in young and innovative companies (so-called "start-ups"). Via Internet portals, potential investors can examine various start-ups and then directly invest in their chosen start-up. In return, investors receive a share in the firm- profit, while companies can use the raised capital to finance their projects. This new way of financing is called "Equity Crowdfunding" (ECF) or "Crowdinvesting". The aim of this dissertation is to provide empirical findings about the characteristics of ECF. In particular, the question of whether ECF is able to overcome geographic barriers, the interdependence of ECF and capital structure, and the risk of failure for funded start-ups and their chances of receiving follow-up funding by venture capitalists or business angels will be analyzed. The results of the first part of this dissertation show that investors in ECF prefer local companies. In particular, investors who invest larger amounts have a stronger tendency to invest in local start-ups. The second part of the dissertation provides first indications of the interdependencies between capital structure and ECF. The analysis makes clear that the capital structure is not a determinant for undertaking an ECF campaign. The third part of the dissertation analyzes the success of companies financed by ECF in a country comparison. The results show that after a successful ECF campaign German companies have a higher chance of receiving follow-up funding by venture capitalists compared to British companies. The probability of survival, however, is slightly lower for German companies. The results provide relevant implications for theory and practice. The existing literature in the area of entrepreneurial finance will be extended by insights into investor behavior, additions to the capital structure theory and a country comparison in ECF. In addition, implications are provided for various actors in practice.
